Stopping the Wrong Channel Before It Shipped

2025 · Enterprise SaaS · AI Strategy & Architecture · Oracle

Evaluating Generative-AI Delivery Paths Under Executive Pressure

Conceptual comparison of external messaging platforms and an internal AI conversation model.

Although not formally tasked with platform evaluation, I stepped in to own the UX decision framework—examining messaging channels, interaction surfaces, and delivery models so design recommendations would be credible, defensible, and useful to executive decision-makers.

Impact

Stopped a non-viable architectural bet before engineering commitment

Validated strategy through platform engineering independent review

Redirected AI investment toward a controllable, extensible foundation

Preserved future optionality while enabling short-term delivery

The Problem

Executive leadership directed the team to explore generative-AI conversations delivered through external messaging apps—using Apple iMessage as the reference model.

The appeal was obvious: familiar UX, no new app surface, and natural-language interaction powered by AI.

The risks were not.

Global reach, protocol fragmentation, vendor lock-in, security, delivery guarantees, and enterprise compliance all posed structural constraints that intuition alone could not resolve.

I needed to evaluate whether this direction was visionary—or a dead end—before it shipped.

A seductive idea is still a liability if the system can’t support it.

My Approach

Evaluated

Researched messaging apps, protocols, vendors, and backend delivery models

Eliminated

Ruled out external channels that failed at scale, security, or control

Validated

Partnered with platform engineering for independent review

Redirected

Recommended an internal AI conversation model as the durable path

The goal wasn’t to find a way forward—it was to remove the wrong ones.

A funnel or decision tree showing options narrowing due to platform, protocol, and compliance constraints.

The Outcome

Product leadership deprioritized external messaging channels and aligned on an internal AI conversation model as the long-term direction.

Because the platform capabilities required for that model were still in progress, the team adopted a pragmatic interim solution—AI-assisted email—without contradicting the strategic direction.

This work elevated the quality of the executive decision by surfacing UX-driven implications around scalability, governance, and user trust—allowing engineering and leadership to make an informed call without committing design effort to a path that would not hold up long-term.

Diagram showing long-term in-app AI strategy alongside interim email-based delivery used as a short-term bridge.

The Insight

Senior design leadership isn’t about picking the most exciting idea. It’s about doing the work that makes the right decision unavoidable—especially when pressure comes from the top.